.

DentalDat is here for you!

Can't find what you are looking for? Use a comments box, contact me form, DentalDat Forum, Facebook, Twitter, or e-mail me at Thecreator@dentaldat.com to let me know what you want to know!

Hope you enjoy your visit here at DentalDat!
Showing posts with label dental school total science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dental school total science. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

DAT Breakdown by: SLYgUY2098


To Start of this new year "SLYgUY2098" wanted to lend all of you pre-dental students out there a hand by posting his DAT breakdown here on DentalDAT. First of all congratulations to "SLYgUY2098" for a job well done. Scoring in the 98th percentile is not an easy task when it comes to the DAT. I highly recommend that you read this breakdown along with the others that are posted in the DentalDAT archive. Use the information that you gather from these successful students to formulate a winning strategy for yourself. Once you formulate a strategy that fits you and your schedule stick to it and you will see the results that you have been longing for.

SLYgUY2098 DAT Breakdown

PAT: 21 (87.9%)
QR: 24 (99.0%)
RC: 23 (89.8%)
Bio: 21 (92.3%)
GC: 21 (87.0%)
OC: 27 (98.7%)

TS: 22 (95.6%)
AA: 23 (98.7%)

Generally speaking, I thought the actual DAT exam was easier in respects to the practice that I've been doing. The only section that I thought was harder was the PAT, specifically pattern folding. All in all, as many have stated, if I can do it, so can you.

I would like to thank everyone on SDN that has helped me throughout this summer and dentalworks for his DAT 8-week study guide that I based my study schedule on. My family, friends, and you SDNers truly made these scores possible. I am humbled and deeply grateful. I will be posting a complete breakdown later tonight.

Here's my breakdown:

Practice Tests:
TopScore:
Bio/GC/OC/QR/RC/PAT/TS/AA
Test 1: 29/28/30/22/22/20/30/26
Test 2: 22/28/30/30/29/25/27/28
Test 3: 24/28/30/26/22/21/28/26

Achiever:
Test 1: 17/19/19/18/18/16/19/18

**Before I begin the actual breakdown of how I tackled my studying for the DAT, a quick note about materials. KBB was not the best. I read it as a  foundation but didn't rely on it at all. Pretty much none of it stuck after I finished with it. Achiever was ridiculous and  killed my confidence. TopScore was pretty accurate in its difficulty.  Nearly matched that of the real DAT.** Additionally, I modeled my study schedule after dentalwork's 8-week study program.

Biology: 
Materials: KBB, Destroyer, DAT QVault, Cliff's AP Bio, Alan's Notes
Comments:
I first started with KBB and realized that practically nothing I read was sticking. Asking advice from a friend who already took the DAT last year, I then bought the Cliff's AP Bio. Solid investment. Cliff's goes through almost everything you need for the biology section of the DAT. It lacked on details regarding the skeletal system (bone anatomy) and special senses (eye and ear).

Next, after reading through Cliff's twice, I then did Destroyer. First time through, I got about 50-60 wrong. Then my second run, I got 10 wrong. After Destroyer 2x, I then reviewed Alan's notes. They are detailed, but very succinct. You really have to know your material to find Alan's notes useful (and they are!).

I intermittently did DAT Qvault (bought the subscription) and it really helped. Started out at 18 for benchmark test #1 and went up to 23 for benchmark test #9 and #10. Very good investment and helped broaden the range of questions I came across.

Overall, I felt quite prepared for the bio section of the real DAT.

General Chemistry: 
Materials: KBB, Destroyer, Chad's Videos
Comments: 
I watched Chad's videos once, then did Destroyer once. Took notes using the handouts provided by Chad and then ran through Destroyer. I initially tried Destroyer prior to watching Chad's videos and I knew next to nothing. Chad's videos are VERY helpful. It was worth my money!

Overall, I felt super prepared for this section.

Organic Chemistry: 
Materials: KBB, Destroyer, Chad's Videos
Comments: 
Same thing as General Chemistry. Did Destroyer twice, and looked at the roadmaps too! (They help!)

Overall, I felt really prepared for this section as well.

Quantitative Reasoning:
Materials: KBB, Math Destroyer, Chad's Videos
Comments:
Judging from the success I had with Chad's videos for GC and OC, I plunged into his latest collection of videos, the ones for the QR section. It turns out I made the right decision. I tried Math Destroyer before watching the videos and I ran out of time about 25 problems into it. Post-watching the videos, I nailed all 40 with a few minutes to spare. I did Math Destroyer once through.

Overall, I was really surprised at the QR section. I know it has a nasty reputation for being the section people run out of time on, but I finished with 5 minutes left. There was nothing I didn't know or see before between Chad's videos and Math Destroyer.

Added advice: Please do not underestimate this section! I know I first did because I assumed I knew everything due to my perfect math SAT scores, but that's not the case! Take this section seriously too!

Reading Comprehension:
Materials: Crack DAT Reading (10-test), TopScore, Achiever
Comments:
Crack DAT Reading was nice, I used the 10-test version. Went through all of them, scored 23-25 on each one. It had more history and philosophical passages, very few on science. It helped build my speed and focus.

TopScore reading passages were far more like the real DAT because they were highly technical and science-based. Achiever was a bit overboard in my opinion.

Overall, I was confident going into the RC section. I read every passage (taking 10 minutes maximum), then answered the questions (10 minutes max). I didn't run out of time.

PAT:
Materials: KBB, Crack DAT PAT (10-test), TopScore
Comments:
Well I knew this was going to be a killer. Started out with CDP at a 16, worked my way up to 25 by the end of test 10. CDP was great because it had excellent explanations, and the range of figures/patterns/hole punches were great. Timing is key. But the most important part was practice. Practice, practice, practice. This isn't something you can "learn" how to do, it is simply practice-driven.

Overall, PAT wasn't terrible. Keyholes, hole punches, and cube counting were easier than CDP. Angles and TFE were the same difficulty. Pattern folding was pretty tricky, definitely harder than CDP. The pattern folding on TopScore was more representative of the difficulty of the real DAT though. Actually, TopScore PAT in general is quite representative of the actual DAT. Again, Achiever is pretty nuts.

Overall:
My experience with studying for the DAT has proven to me one thing: with hard work, anything can be achieved. I started my studying on July 5th, and concluded it on August 21st. I worked 8am-5pm Monday-Friday during that timeframe, and yet I still managed to study effectively and efficiently. I guarantee you that your hard work will be bountifully rewarded at the conclusion of your studies.

Other DAT Breakdowns

Thanks once again to "SLYgUY2098" for donating his DAT Breakdown! If you have a DAT Breakdown you would like to donate you can contact me via e-mail at TheCreator@DentalDAT.com.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Dental Schools Ranked by DAT Scores


Many students wonder what dental school suites them the best according to their DAT scores. This was I question that I definitely had when I was trying to decide which schools to apply to. Remember, the DAT is a very big portion of your application and should not be taken lightly. However, this does not mean that if you earned a 19 academic average (AA) that you cannot apply to a school that has a an average AA of 21. The statistics are just that, statistics! If a school accepts someone with an AA of 23 that means that they must have accepted several others with lower scores. 


When scores are reported they are seen in three general categories including Academic Average (all of your scores averaged together except perceptual ability scores), Total Science (average of the biology, general chemistry, and organic chemistry sections), and Perceptual Ability. Each of these general categories along with each individual section must be taken into account when choosing schools to apply to. 


Some schools will put a high emphasis on the science sections while others may put more weight on reading comprehension or the perceptual ability section. 


Other factors that you will want to consider while choosing schools to apply to include but are not limited to overall GPA, science GPA, extra curricular activities, leadership experience, volunteer experiences, and shadowing. 


For your convenience, I listed the dental schools in order of highest Academic Average to lowest Academic Average. I also included a list of the schools ranked according to their perceptual ability scores. The statistics shown come from the "2010 ADEA Official Guide to Dental Schools". 



Dental School Rankings (Academic Average)

  1. Columbia 21.7 
  2. UCLA 21 
  3. Harvard 21 
  4. Stony Brook  21 
  5. Alabama 20 
  6. UCSF 20 
  7. UoP 20 
  8. Connecticut 20 
  9. New York  20 
  10. Pennsylvania 20 
  11. Minnesota  19.63 
  12. Nova 19.58 
  13. Maryland  19.5 
  14. New Jersey  19.45 
  15. Buffalo  19.42  
  16. Pittsburgh 19.4
  17. Washington 19.39 
  18. Boston University  19.35
  19. Temple  19.3
  20. Houston  19.15
  21. Louisiana State  19.1
  22. Illinois at Chicago  19.1
  23. UNLV 19.01
  24. USC 19 
  25. Colorado Denver 19
  26. Florida  19
  27. Iowa  19
  28. Kentucky  19
  29. Tufts 19
  30. Detroit Mercy  19
  31. Michigan  19
  32. Chapel Hill  19
  33. Case 19
  34. Ohio State 19
  35. Oklahoma  19
  36. Baylor  19
  37. San Antonio  19
  38. Virginia Commonwealth  19
  39. Indiana  19
  40. Loma Linda  18.79
  41. Oregon  18.71
  42. Southern Illinois  18.6
  43. Midwestern  18.5
  44. Creighton 18.48
  45. Missouri - Kansas City  18.02
  46. Western U. 18
  47. Georgia 18
  48. Louisville  18
  49. Mississippi  18
  50. Nebraska  18
  51. South Carolina  18
  52. Tennessee  18
  53. Marquette 18
  54. Arizona  17.84
  55. Howard 17.7
  56. West Virginia 17
  57. Puerto Rico  16
  58. Meharry 16 

Dental School Rankings (Perceptual Ability)

  1. UCLA 21 
  2. UoP 21
  3. Harvard 21
  4. Stony Brook  21
  5. Minnesota  20.74
  6. UNLV 20.24
  7. Loma Linda  20.15
  8. Creighton 20.11
  9. Washington 20.02
  10. Buffalo  20.01
  11. UCSF 20
  12. Indiana  20
  13. Detroit Mercy  20
  14. Michigan  20
  15. New York  20
  16. Case 20
  17. Ohio State 20
  18. Pennsylvania 20
  19. South Carolina  20
  20. Virginia Commonwealth  20
  21. Oregon  19.93
  22. Temple  19.7
  23. Pittsburgh 19.6
  24. Maryland  19.3
  25. Houston  19.25
  26. Georgia 19.2
  27. Boston University  19.15
  28. Southern Illinois  19.1
  29. Alabama 19
  30. Midwestern  19
  31. USC 19
  32. Western U. 19
  33. Colorado Denver 19
  34. Connecticut 19
  35. Florida  19
  36. Illinois at Chicago  19
  37. Iowa  19
  38. Kentucky  19
  39. Louisville  19
  40. Tufts 19
  41. Mississippi  19
  42. Chapel Hill  19
  43. Marquette 19
  44. Oklahoma  18.98
  45. Louisiana State  18.9
  46. Nova 18.85
  47. New Jersey  18.73
  48. Arizona  18.34
  49. Missouri - Kansas City  18
  50. Tennessee  18 
  51. Baylor  18
  52. San Antonio  18
  53. West Virginia 18
  54. Howard 17.4
  55. Nebraska  17
  56. Puerto Rico  16
  57. Meharry 16  


*NOTE: The statistics that have been listed were taken from the "2010 ADEA Official Guide to Dental Schools".
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...